Police Sergeant Practice Exam

In which situation would it be appropriate for a supervisor to violate the principle of unity of command?

1. When efficiency is endangered

2. When safety is endangered

3. When the organization's reputation is endangered

4. When there is an absence of a designated leader

The correct answer is: When safety is endangered

The principle of unity of command asserts that each employee should report to only one supervisor to ensure clarity in command and accountability. However, in situations where safety is endangered, a supervisor may need to take immediate action that could involve temporarily bypassing this principle. When there is an imminent threat to safety, such as during an active shooter situation or a natural disaster, immediate responses are necessary to protect officers, civilians, and property. In such scenarios, clear and decisive action can trump standard protocols, allowing different leaders to step in to provide directives relevant to the immediate context. This response prioritizes the well-being and safety of individuals over rigid adherence to organizational hierarchy. In contrast, while efficiency and organizational reputation are important, they do not often present immediate dangers or risks to life that would necessitate an urgent breach of command. Although the absence of a designated leader might create confusion, it does not inherently justify putting personnel at risk as safety does. Thus, the need to prioritize safety is paramount, making it the appropriate circumstance for a temporary deviation from the principle of unity of command.