Police Sergeant Practice Exam

In what situation might public chastisement of an employee be justified?

1. To correct a minor issue

2. When necessary to halt a continuing breach of order

3. To make an example of the employee

4. During a team-building exercise

The correct answer is: When necessary to halt a continuing breach of order

Public chastisement of an employee may be justified in situations where it is necessary to halt a continuing breach of order. This is particularly relevant in a law enforcement context, where maintaining discipline and operational integrity is crucial. When an employee's actions are consistently undermining policies, procedures, or safety protocols, public acknowledgment of the behavior can serve as an immediate corrective measure. This action communicates to the individual and the team that certain behaviors cannot be tolerated and that immediate change is essential. Addressing the issue publicly can reaffirm the importance of adherence to protocols and provide a clear message that continued breaches will have consequences, thereby potentially curbing further misconduct. The ultimate goal in such situations is to restore order and ensure the effectiveness and safety of the team as a whole. Involving the team in understanding the rationale behind the chastisement can also foster an atmosphere of accountability, where everyone knows the standards expected of them. This approach aims to not only correct the specific issue at hand but also to underscore the overarching necessity for professionalism and order within the unit.